Home About Legal Team Services Case Studies Gallery Contact

Results & Precedents

The cases that made V.P. Nathan & Partners a name in Malaysian law.

Over five decades, our lawyers have shaped how Malaysian courts decide questions of insurance, injury and liability. These are some of the matters worth talking about.

Insurance Litigation · Motor Accident

They wanted RM1.39 million. We brought it down to RM313,000.

A RM1.39 million bodily-injury claim built on 16 injury heads and a robo…

2025Read →
Insurance Litigation · Burns & Amputation

RM626,000 claimed across 19 injury heads. We identified the double-counting and brought it to RM370,000.

A road accident plaintiff with extensive burns, digit gangrene with auto…

2026Read →
Insurance Litigation · Catastrophic Injury

Minimally conscious, not vegetative. The distinction that shaped a RM1.3 million capping strategy.

A plaintiff left bedridden after a severe junction collision was minimal…

2026Read →
Insurance Litigation · Prosthetics Dispute

The prosthesis was quoted at RM3.68 million. The life expectancy behind it was labelled “for entertainment use only.”

A trans-humeral amputation case where the plaintiff's RM3.68 million pro…

2026Read →
Bodily Injury · Multi-System Injuries

Both sides’ experts agreed on the injuries. The difference was how the numbers were built.

A serious road accident in Ipoh left the plaintiff wheelchair-bound with…

2026Read →
Insurance Litigation · Traumatic Brain Injury

No helmet. Two plaintiffs. RM2.1 million claimed. Settled at RM600,000.

A Kota Bharu collision left the rider with severe traumatic brain injury…

2026Read →
Insurance Litigation · Permanent Disability

The RM2.1 million permanent disability claim had nowhere to stand.

A Raub road accident plaintiff claimed permanent disability and lifelong…

2026Read →
Insurance Litigation · Motor Accident

They wanted RM1.39 million. We brought it down to RM313,000.

A RM1.39 million bodily-injury claim built on 16 injury heads, a misclas…

2025Read →
Bodily Injury · Surveillance Evidence

The claim said total incapacity. Surveillance footage told a different story.

A road accident plaintiff claimed catastrophic damages exceeding RM800,0…

2024Read →

Facing a matter like one of these?

The team that argued these cases is the team you would be working with.

Chat with us